テロ対策が完了していない原子力発電所を稼働させない方針は至極まともなのだが、どのようなテロを想定しているのかが分からない。
テロリストがナイフを持って敷地内に侵入するのを防ぐ施設なのか？ミサイルを撃ち込まれても大丈夫な施設なのか？
The picture below is the article of the Nihon Keizai Shimbun this morning (27 April, 2019).
The policy of not operating a nuclear power plant that has not completed counter-terrorism is extremely appropriate, but it is not clear what kind of terrorism is assumed.
Is it a facility that prevents terrorists from getting into the site with a knife? Is it a facility that is safe to be shot with missiles?
